Oroville adopts changes to Critical Areas ordinance

Some of the several residences that make up Champerty Shores, just south of the Canadian border and on the east side of Lake Osoyoos, will be connected to the city water system following the approval of an easement from the state Department of Natural Resources for the pipe to cross DNR land. Gary DeVon/staff photos

Some of the several residences that make up Champerty Shores, just south of the Canadian border and on the east side of Lake Osoyoos, will be connected to the city water system following the approval of an easement from the state Department of Natural Resources for the pipe to cross DNR land. Gary DeVon/staff photos

Looks like no mosquito spraying this year

OROVILLE – After several public hearings and nearly two years of interim ordinances, the Oroville City Council adopted the changes to the Critical Areas Ordinance at their Tuesday, July 2 meeting.

“At the last council meeting I proposed changes to lessen the impact of the prohibitions in the floodplain as long as they have at least 5000 square feet to include in upland property or to designate as open space,” said Chris Branch, director of community development.

Councilman Jon Neal expressed concern about 100 foot setbacks in the riparian areas and said it looked like there was an additional buffer of 25 feet on top of that.

“Did I read that right?” asked Neal.

Branch said that 25 feet of riparian area was required, but not 100 feet from the ordinary high water mark, only 50 feet.

Following these few questions about setbacks in the riparian area Councilman Ed Naillon made the motion to adopt a resolution making the changes, including making a change to reflect a lesser setback requirement. The motion was seconded by Councilman Tony Koepke and passed unanimously.

Rod Noel, superintendent of Public Works, updated the council on mosquito spraying for this year.

“I received a call from the Public Works director of Omak last Friday afternoon and he said they are not going to spray as they neglected to get a spray permit for the Tribal side of the river. That pretty well prices us out of the market. We wouldn’t be able to get the acres required to get the copter guys at a price we could afford.”

Work has begun to bury water pipe to connect Champerty Shores with the Oroville water system. The homes will eventually connect to the Eastlake Sewer system as well.

Work has begun to bury water pipe to connect Champerty Shores with the Oroville water system. The homes will eventually connect to the Eastlake Sewer system as well.

Police Chief Clay Warnstaff asked the council if they had seen that the school district had cut down the trees along the elementary school.

“Those trees were city heirlooms,” said Warnstaff, asking if that was city or school property.

“Part of the sidewalk ordinance says that all trees within the city right of way are property of the city, like the sidewalk. The adjacent property owner is responsible for taking care of them, like pruning. I’m not sure that would include chopping them down,” said Branch.

“Those were healthy maple trees,” added Noel.

Warnstaff suggested that the city inventory other trees within the right of way and look at ways to preserve them.

The council was also informed of the final copy of an easement from the state Department of Natural Resources that will allow a water line connection between the city water system and Champerty Shores. The new connections will serve over a dozen homes on the east side of Lake Osoyoos, just south of the Canadian border.

About Gary DeVon

Gary DeVon is the managing editor of the Okanogan Valley Gazette-Tribune and celebrated his 25th year at the newspaper in August 2012. He graduated from Gonzaga University with a degree in Communications - Print Journalism, with an emphasis in photojournalism. He is a proud alumnus of Oroville High School. His family first settled in Okanogan County in the late 1800s. His parents are Judy DeVon and the late Larry DeVon and he has two younger brothers - Dante and Michael. Many family members still call Oroville home. He is single with a grown daughter, Segornae Douglas and a young granddaughter, Erin.

Commenting Rules

We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments civil, smart, on-topic and free of profanity.

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and "drive-by" commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

3 Responses to Oroville adopts changes to Critical Areas ordinance

  1. John Descoteaux July 16, 2013 at 3:54 pm #

    Cut down the Trees! Good example for the School Children. Parking is more important than the Environment. Will fines be levied and charges laid?

  2. Byron Mustard July 18, 2013 at 8:45 pm #

    I just read the city council meeting article, and have talked with the Oroville School Supt. about the tree issue. Seems like there are a lot of reasons that they were cut down but not much involvement from the community. What I got out of the conversation I had with the School Supt. is there were reasons to do what he did, but not involving the people who pay his salary is inexcusable. Are we sure we want a person in a major position putting HIS own will above the will and needs of our children. I do not think this is a person that serves us and the children, the more I look at this can we trust a person who would rather apologize than get permission. I find it hard to trust him (School Supt.) for the future decisions of our Community Schools and especially with our children. As I read the RCW's of this state, seems that destruction of Public property is still against the law.

  3. Sharon Mae Matey July 25, 2013 at 10:32 pm #

    Why cut those beautiful trees…it looks bare now. Another example of losing something not only beautiful, but something of the past that can not be replaced. This was bad planning.

Leave a Reply