To Grow or Not To Grow: Choosing the future of marijuana farms in Okanogan County

Money doesn’t grow on trees. But sometimes, it comes pretty close.

Daniel Klayton
Daniel Klayton

Money doesn’t grow on trees. But sometimes, it comes pretty close.

The question is – do we let them grow, or cut them down?

Since voters passed Initiative 502 over three years ago, Washington has been at the forefront of a growing national trend to legalize recreational marijuana usage. And the front of that wave is rich with development opportunities, unexplored territory, and lucrative economic potential.

The Okanogan Valley, thanks to both our climate and economy, is uniquely poised to capitalize on that potential.

Before legalization, most cannabis agriculture was hidden away inside – for obvious reasons. As medicinal and recreational legalization spreads, many farms continue to operate indoors. Although indoor grows can generate successful yields, the requirements to provide enough light and resources are massive. High-wattage lights keep plants happy, but send electricity bills skyrocketing. And in a world increasingly burdened by the effects of climate change, the carbon emissions generated by indoor-grown marijuana are shocking to say the least.

According to a study in the Journal of Energy Policy, one pound of indoor-grown marijuana generates about 3,000 pounds of carbon emissions. To put that into perspective, you could drive an average sedan from Oroville to Los Angeles, then cross-country to New York, and you’d still create fewer emissions than that one pound of indoor-grown pot.

Hence the enthusiasm for outdoor marijuana farms, freed from the need to hide. But outdoor farms need lots of sun to keep their plants thriving with high yields. And in Washington, a state notorious for its rain-drenched cities, where’s an enterprising marijuana farmer to find enough sunshine?

Welcome to the Okanogan Valley, home of the oft-touted 300 days of sunshine per year. Add to that our region’s low real-estate prices, and you’ve got quite the combination for potential growers.

And Washington’s agri-entrepreneurs have noticed.

From July 2014 through July 2015, 75 recreational marijuana licenses were issued in Okanogan County – 42 for production, 30 for processing and three for retail. From these numbers alone, you can see that marijuana grown here is mostly being sold elsewhere. During that period, Okanogan County received about eight percent of statewide production licenses, but less than two percent of retail licenses. Among all Washington counties, Okanogan County was issued the fourth-highest number of licenses, and the second-highest number of production licenses (behind only Spokane County).

So what effect is the industry having on communities?

Tax revenue, for one. In the first year of operation (July 2014 to July 2015), the Washington cannabis industry brought over $75 million to the state. Those dollars are shared with cities and counties that allow the marijuana industry to operate within their jurisdiction.

Beyond tax revenue, marijuana agriculture brings jobs. In addition to jobs associated with any agriculture business, marijuana creates employment space for trimmers, security, seed harvesters and more. Creating value-added products – edibles, concentrates, and the like – increases employment to include chemists, chefs, packagers and more.

As with any new business, large portions of expenditures go into the local economy. Building materials, construction labor and farm supplies can all be sourced locally, further stimulating the local economy.

And because revenue is coming mostly from sales to retail stores outside of the county, all these expenditures and wages are bringing outside dollars into the local economy, enriching the community as a whole.

Still, marijuana farms do have their detractions. Some neighboring residents dislike the plants’ smell, which sometimes drifts over fences. And with any new industrial or agriculture business in town, construction can be seen as an eyesore, lighting can be bothersome, and other changes can strike nerves.

Earlier this month, spurred by resident complaints, the Okanogan County commissioners set in place a six-month moratorium on marijuana farms, preventing any new farms from being built in unincorporated areas of the county.

The infant industry of recreational marijuana is in its most formative years. Okanogan County, blessed with a grow-friendly climate and inexpensive real estate, finds itself in a fortuitous position, poised to benefit heartily. But winds can shift quickly, and the region could easily be left behind. The recent moratorium may prove to be a temporary pause, or a sign of changing winds. Only time, and the active participation of county residents, will tell.

5 thoughts on “To Grow or Not To Grow: Choosing the future of marijuana farms in Okanogan County

  1. Marijuana is not the only outcome of a crop–don't forget the tremendous prospect of Hemp itself, which has unreal potential as a fiber. Hemp fiber has better qualities in the long run than wood or cotton. Push it to it's greatest potential. Oh, yeah–I'm a Canadian, but born and raised in the apple orchards of the Okanogan Valley

  2. Good article, yet you lightly touched on one of the big problems, the odor of these farms during late season, September/October and the lack of Zoning regulations. This odor is so bad that it is hard to be outside your home. Yes we have orchards around that can smell bad for a day or two when spraying or being fertalized but not for 1 to 2 months straight. I think it was very responsible for the county to put a moratorium on new farms. They need to get this right ,as currently these farms are popping up anywhere they can get water, whether it is in populated neighborhoods or not. The county needs to set a zone that these farms could live and keep them away from the homes and populations. Hopefully, we wouldn't let heavy industry build wherever they want even though it would be good for the economy. That is why there are zoning rules established in most counties. Okanogan county needs tax dollars and jobs, but we need to respect the quality of life in this great area. It needs to be done right before it get's anymore out of hand.

  3. And how does this moratorium fit with the right to farm ordinace? The commissioners spoke to the issue of smell, noise etc. This is just not the kind of farming done by people they approve of. Well the feed lot down the road smells all the time, but then again this is cattle country. The people who have cancer, ( poision orchards ) benifit from this enterprise

  4. I think legalizing marijuana in the long run is not going to be beneficial. Everyone is happy about the boost in the economy, that is all well and good for the moment. But what happens in the long run. When crime rate goes up, kids getting addicted and having to go into rehab, innocent people are getting hurt and killed because of people using Marijuana and driving.The cost in the long run will be more than any profit. I do believe it has its medicinal properties but it has been proven that it is a gateway drug. Kids have enough problems growing up in our society we do not need to add more. Instead of spending the money on pot farms spend it on a place where the kids can go and have fun.

  5. Daniel,
    I would like to ask a few questions. Given the conflict between federal law and the states rights. Why don't you quantify the financial gains in all of this. Other than your investors who is making out here? Sure some of your employees are making a fair wage. But do the employees pay income tax, do the employers pay medical benefits and L&I to the state for job related injuries? Are all the employees paid above board and not under the table. Someone said you guys grossed $100M and expect $150M this year. Whe does all that money go? You show great concern about the carbon foot print but could care less who you impact with the intrusive foot print of the grows them selves. My point at the meetings are about neighborhood character. You put the grows right in the middle of quarter million dollar homes that people built to retire in. Where do you people live? I only see RVs and mil-vans inside your grotesque fenced compounds. Your culture sees the internal financial gain. Our culture who most people in this community didn't vote for see an invasion of their neighborhood and potential damage to their kids. I would hope that the commissioners are hearing the communities concerns and forces your operations as far off the grid as possible.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Stories